『测评』OVZ.APP – 河南移动NAT / KVM / 256M内存 / 300G月流量 / 月付24.98元起

『测评』OVZ.APP - 河南移动NAT / KVM / 256M内存 / 300G月流量 / 月付24.98元起 主机测评 第1张

ovzapp又上KVM鸡啦!(23333

OVZ.APP,国人商家,于今年4月份左右创立。老板号称鸽子王,之前香港HKT一直鸽了挺久,不过最近上新很频繁。

今天带来新上线的一款河南移动NAT,KVM虚拟化共享IP,直连NTT,HKIX链路,主要适合流量中转、监控节点等( 该虚拟服务器不适合搭建网站 )。

该产品无退款保证。(此服务器目前处于Beta期间 暂不提供SLA保证)

套餐详情

HN-NAT-VPS mini
  • vCPU:1
  • 内存:256MB
  • 硬盘:4GB SSD
  • 流量:300GB
  • 带宽:50Mbps
  • 端口:10条转发规则
  • 架构:KVM
  • 价格:¥24.98/月
  • 点击订购
HN-NAT-VPS I
  • vCPU:1
  • 内存:512MB
  • 硬盘:5GB SSD
  • 流量:2TB
  • 带宽:100Mbps
  • 端口:20条转发规则
  • 架构:KVM
  • 价格:¥38.98/月
  • 点击订购

测评详情

 基本信息

本次测评所用机器为 HN-NAT-VPS I ,感谢商家提供测试机。

CPU model            : QEMU Virtual CPU version (cpu64-rhel6)
Number of cores      : 1
CPU frequency        : 2133.408 MHz
Total size of Disk   : 4.0 GB (1.3 GB Used)
Total amount of Mem  : 485 MB (318 MB Used)
Total amount of Swap : 1023 MB (0 MB Used)
System uptime        : 0 days, 0 hour 10 min
Load average         : 0.13, 0.07, 0.02
OS                   : CentOS 6.10
Arch                 : x86_64 (64 Bit)
Kernel               : 4.9.127-32.el6.x86_64
ip                   : 111.6.79.122
ipaddr               : 中国 河南 南阳  移动
vm                   : kvm

硬盘速度

ioping: seek rate
    min/avg/max/mdev = 61.2 us / 108.0 us / 3.20 ms / 35.3 us
ioping: sequential speed
    generated 8.50 k requests in 5.00 s, 2.07 GiB, 1.70 k iops, 424.8 MiB/s

Unixbench

========================================================================
   BYTE UNIX Benchmarks (Version 5.1.3)

   System: vm1212885.ovz.app: GNU/Linux
   OS: GNU/Linux -- 4.9.127-32.el6.x86_64 -- #1 SMP Mon Sep 17 13:48:11 UTC 2018
   Machine: x86_64 (x86_64)
   Language: en_US.utf8 (charmap="UTF-8", collate="UTF-8")
   CPU 0: QEMU Virtual CPU version (cpu64-rhel6) (4266.8 bogomips)
          x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET
   16:20:28 up 46 min,  1 user,  load average: 0.50, 0.13, 0.04; runlevel 3

------------------------------------------------------------------------
Benchmark Run: Fri Dec 14 2018 16:20:28 - 16:48:35
1 CPU in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests

Dhrystone 2 using register variables       21498170.4 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone                     2516.6 MWIPS (9.9 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput                               2089.9 lps   (29.9 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks        214980.4 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks           58451.9 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks        592382.4 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput                              301235.5 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching                  80880.8 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation                               4606.1 lps   (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                   2471.6 lpm   (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                    325.9 lpm   (60.0 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead                         250739.5 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)

System Benchmarks Index Values               BASELINE       RESULT    INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables         116700.0   21498170.4   1842.2
Double-Precision Whetstone                       55.0       2516.6    457.6
Execl Throughput                                 43.0       2089.9    486.0
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks          3960.0     214980.4    542.9
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks            1655.0      58451.9    353.2
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks          5800.0     592382.4   1021.3
Pipe Throughput                               12440.0     301235.5    242.2
Pipe-based Context Switching                   4000.0      80880.8    202.2
Process Creation                                126.0       4606.1    365.6
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                     42.4       2471.6    582.9
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                      6.0        325.9    543.1
System Call Overhead                          15000.0     250739.5    167.2
                                                                   ========
System Benchmarks Index Score                                         453.7

海外速度

Node Name:                      IPv4 address:                  Download Speed
CacheFly:                       204.93.150.152:                0 B/s |      N/A     
ping: unknown host speedtest.tokyo.linode.com
Linode, Tokyo, JP:              :                              0 B/s |      N/A     
Linode, Tokyo2, JP:             139.162.65.37:             4.92 MiB/s |   39.37 Mbps
Linode, Singapore, SG:          139.162.23.4:              3.57 MiB/s |   28.56 Mbps
Linode, Fremont, CA:            50.116.14.9:                   0 B/s |      N/A     
Linode, Newark, NJ:             50.116.57.237:                 0 B/s |      N/A     
ping: unknown host speedtest.london.linode.com
Linode, London, UK:             :                              0 B/s |      N/A     
Linode, Frankfurt, DE:          139.162.130.8:                 0 B/s |      N/A     
Softlayer, Tokyo, JP:           161.202.125.20:                0 B/s |      N/A     
Softlayer, Singapore, SG:       119.81.28.170:                 0 B/s |      N/A     
Softlayer, Seoul, KR:           119.81.28.170:             2.89 MiB/s |   23.15 Mbps
Softlayer, HongKong, CN:        119.81.130.170:                0 B/s |      N/A     
Softlayer, Dallas, TX:          169.48.124.82:             1.35 MiB/s |   10.77 Mbps
Softlayer, Seattle, WA:         67.228.112.250:                0 B/s |      N/A     
Softlayer, Frankfurt, DE:       159.122.69.4:              1.09 MiB/s |    8.70 Mbps
Softlayer, Paris, FR:           159.8.64.212:             16.84 KiB/s |    0.13 Mbps
Leaseweb, HongKong, CN:         43.249.36.49:                  0 B/s |      N/A     
Leaseweb, Singapore, SG:        103.254.153.18:                0 B/s |      N/A     
Leaseweb, Washington D.C., US:  207.244.94.80:                 0 B/s |      N/A     
Leaseweb, San Francisco, US:    209.58.135.187:                0 B/s |      N/A     
Leaseweb, Netherlands, NL:      5.79.108.33:              29.18 KiB/s |    0.23 Mbps
OVH, Montreal, CA:              192.99.19.165:                 0 B/s |      N/A     
Hinet, Taiwan, TW:              210.61.132.1:                  0 B/s |      N/A     

国内速度

节点名称:                   IP地址:                      下载速度  
安徽合肥电信:             61.191.111.11:                 0 B/s |      N/A     
江苏南京电信:             202.102.23.133:                0 B/s |      N/A     
江西南昌电信:             182.98.238.226:                0 B/s |      N/A     
新疆昌吉电信:             61.128.107.242:                0 B/s |      N/A     
安徽合肥联通:             112.122.10.26:             9.60 MiB/s |   76.80 Mbps
山东济南联通:             221.214.108.58:                0 B/s |      N/A     
吉林长春联通:             221.9.246.35:                  0 B/s |      N/A     
湖北武汉联通:             113.57.249.2:             71.99 KiB/s |    0.56 Mbps
西藏拉萨联通:             221.13.70.244:            10.74 MiB/s |   85.94 Mbps
辽宁沈阳联通:             175.167.135.234:               0 B/s |      N/A     
山西太原联通:             218.26.109.107:            4.89 MiB/s |   39.16 Mbps
江苏南京联通:             153.37.96.226:             1.28 MiB/s |   10.21 Mbps
安徽合肥移动:             120.209.140.60:                0 B/s |      N/A     
山西太原移动:             183.203.24.210:            5.38 MiB/s |   43.07 Mbps
四川成都移动:             183.221.247.9:           356.85 KiB/s |    2.79 Mbps
新疆昌吉移动:             117.190.59.82:                 0 B/s |      N/A     
吉林长春移动:             111.26.139.78:                 0 B/s |      N/A     
ping: unknown host speedtest1.xz.chinamobile.com
西藏拉萨移动:             :                              0 B/s |      N/A     
辽宁沈阳移动:             221.180.176.102:               0 B/s |      N/A     
ping: unknown host speedtest1.hb.chinamobile.com
湖北武汉移动:             :                              0 B/s |      N/A     
四川成都教育网:          202.115.1.138:            10.25 MiB/s |   82.02 Mbps

国内延迟

安徽合肥电信
10 packets transmitted, 10 received, 0% packet loss, time 9048ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 33.331/34.003/34.880/0.478 ms
江苏南京电信
10 packets transmitted, 10 received, 0% packet loss, time 18168ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 34.238/34.619/35.643/0.433 ms
江西南昌电信
10 packets transmitted, 10 received, 0% packet loss, time 19070ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 34.330/37.100/39.576/2.431 ms
新疆昌吉电信
10 packets transmitted, 10 received, 0% packet loss, time 9093ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 80.717/81.639/87.202/1.913 ms
安徽合肥联通
10 packets transmitted, 10 received, 0% packet loss, time 9039ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 35.500/37.504/49.286/3.997 ms
山东济南联通
10 packets transmitted, 10 received, 0% packet loss, time 9045ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 26.904/29.032/37.729/3.252 ms
湖北武汉联通
10 packets transmitted, 10 received, 0% packet loss, time 9031ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 15.679/15.912/16.796/0.324 ms
西藏拉萨联通
10 packets transmitted, 10 received, 0% packet loss, time 9086ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 72.343/72.736/74.332/0.593 ms
山西太原移动
10 packets transmitted, 10 received, 0% packet loss, time 21877ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 24.102/24.554/25.390/0.428 ms
四川成都移动
10 packets transmitted, 10 received, 0% packet loss, time 9048ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 32.437/44.467/150.894/35.476 ms
新疆昌吉移动
10 packets transmitted, 10 received, 0% packet loss, time 13290ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 76.753/87.612/180.691/31.030 ms
西藏拉萨移动
10 packets transmitted, 10 received, 0% packet loss, time 9105ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 72.364/80.185/113.603/12.389 ms
湖北武汉移动
10 packets transmitted, 10 received, 0% packet loss, time 28069ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 19.144/19.363/19.645/0.184 ms
四川成都教育网
10 packets transmitted, 10 received, 0% packet loss, time 13223ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 36.856/37.113/37.639/0.342 ms

 
 

参与评论