『测评』OVZ.APP – 河南移动NAT / KVM / 256M内存 / 300G月流量 / 月付24.98元起
ovzapp又上KVM鸡啦！（23333
OVZ.APP，国人商家，于今年4月份左右创立。老板号称鸽子王，之前香港HKT一直鸽了挺久，不过最近上新很频繁。
今天带来新上线的一款河南移动NAT，KVM虚拟化共享IP，直连NTT，HKIX链路，主要适合流量中转、监控节点等（ 该虚拟服务器不适合搭建网站 ）。
该产品无退款保证。(此服务器目前处于Beta期间 暂不提供SLA保证)
套餐详情
HN-NAT-VPS mini
- vCPU：1
- 内存：256MB
- 硬盘：4GB SSD
- 流量：300GB
- 带宽：50Mbps
- 端口：10条转发规则
- 架构：KVM
- 价格：￥24.98/月
- 点击订购
HN-NAT-VPS I
- vCPU：1
- 内存：512MB
- 硬盘：5GB SSD
- 流量：2TB
- 带宽：100Mbps
- 端口：20条转发规则
- 架构：KVM
- 价格：￥38.98/月
- 点击订购
测评详情
基本信息
本次测评所用机器为 HN-NAT-VPS I ，感谢商家提供测试机。
|
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 |
CPU model : QEMU Virtual CPU version (cpu64-rhel6) Number of cores : 1 CPU frequency : 2133.408 MHz Total size of Disk : 4.0 GB (1.3 GB Used) Total amount of Mem : 485 MB (318 MB Used) Total amount of Swap : 1023 MB (0 MB Used) System uptime : 0 days, 0 hour 10 min Load average : 0.13, 0.07, 0.02 OS : CentOS 6.10 Arch : x86_64 (64 Bit) Kernel : 4.9.127-32.el6.x86_64 ip : 111.6.79.122 ipaddr : 中国 河南 南阳 移动 vm : kvm |
硬盘速度
|
1 2 3 4 |
ioping: seek rate min/avg/max/mdev = 61.2 us / 108.0 us / 3.20 ms / 35.3 us ioping: sequential speed generated 8.50 k requests in 5.00 s, 2.07 GiB, 1.70 k iops, 424.8 MiB/s |
Unixbench
|
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 |
======================================================================== BYTE UNIX Benchmarks (Version 5.1.3) System: vm1212885.ovz.app: GNU/Linux OS: GNU/Linux -- 4.9.127-32.el6.x86_64 -- #1 SMP Mon Sep 17 13:48:11 UTC 2018 Machine: x86_64 (x86_64) Language: en_US.utf8 (charmap="UTF-8", collate="UTF-8") CPU 0: QEMU Virtual CPU version (cpu64-rhel6) (4266.8 bogomips) x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET 16:20:28 up 46 min, 1 user, load average: 0.50, 0.13, 0.04; runlevel 3 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Benchmark Run: Fri Dec 14 2018 16:20:28 - 16:48:35 1 CPU in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests Dhrystone 2 using register variables 21498170.4 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Double-Precision Whetstone 2516.6 MWIPS (9.9 s, 7 samples) Execl Throughput 2089.9 lps (29.9 s, 2 samples) File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 214980.4 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 58451.9 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 592382.4 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Pipe Throughput 301235.5 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Pipe-based Context Switching 80880.8 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Process Creation 4606.1 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 2471.6 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 325.9 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples) System Call Overhead 250739.5 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 21498170.4 1842.2 Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 2516.6 457.6 Execl Throughput 43.0 2089.9 486.0 File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 214980.4 542.9 File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 58451.9 353.2 File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 592382.4 1021.3 Pipe Throughput 12440.0 301235.5 242.2 Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 80880.8 202.2 Process Creation 126.0 4606.1 365.6 Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 2471.6 582.9 Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 325.9 543.1 System Call Overhead 15000.0 250739.5 167.2 ======== System Benchmarks Index Score 453.7 |
海外速度
|
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 |
Node Name: IPv4 address: Download Speed CacheFly: 204.93.150.152: 0 B/s | N/A ping: unknown host speedtest.tokyo.linode.com Linode, Tokyo, JP: : 0 B/s | N/A Linode, Tokyo2, JP: 139.162.65.37: 4.92 MiB/s | 39.37 Mbps Linode, Singapore, SG: 139.162.23.4: 3.57 MiB/s | 28.56 Mbps Linode, Fremont, CA: 50.116.14.9: 0 B/s | N/A Linode, Newark, NJ: 50.116.57.237: 0 B/s | N/A ping: unknown host speedtest.london.linode.com Linode, London, UK: : 0 B/s | N/A Linode, Frankfurt, DE: 139.162.130.8: 0 B/s | N/A Softlayer, Tokyo, JP: 161.202.125.20: 0 B/s | N/A Softlayer, Singapore, SG: 119.81.28.170: 0 B/s | N/A Softlayer, Seoul, KR: 119.81.28.170: 2.89 MiB/s | 23.15 Mbps Softlayer, HongKong, CN: 119.81.130.170: 0 B/s | N/A Softlayer, Dallas, TX: 169.48.124.82: 1.35 MiB/s | 10.77 Mbps Softlayer, Seattle, WA: 67.228.112.250: 0 B/s | N/A Softlayer, Frankfurt, DE: 159.122.69.4: 1.09 MiB/s | 8.70 Mbps Softlayer, Paris, FR: 159.8.64.212: 16.84 KiB/s | 0.13 Mbps Leaseweb, HongKong, CN: 43.249.36.49: 0 B/s | N/A Leaseweb, Singapore, SG: 103.254.153.18: 0 B/s | N/A Leaseweb, Washington D.C., US: 207.244.94.80: 0 B/s | N/A Leaseweb, San Francisco, US: 209.58.135.187: 0 B/s | N/A Leaseweb, Netherlands, NL: 5.79.108.33: 29.18 KiB/s | 0.23 Mbps OVH, Montreal, CA: 192.99.19.165: 0 B/s | N/A Hinet, Taiwan, TW: 210.61.132.1: 0 B/s | N/A |
国内速度
|
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 |
节点名称: IP地址: 下载速度 安徽合肥电信: 61.191.111.11: 0 B/s | N/A 江苏南京电信: 202.102.23.133: 0 B/s | N/A 江西南昌电信: 182.98.238.226: 0 B/s | N/A 新疆昌吉电信: 61.128.107.242: 0 B/s | N/A 安徽合肥联通: 112.122.10.26: 9.60 MiB/s | 76.80 Mbps 山东济南联通: 221.214.108.58: 0 B/s | N/A 吉林长春联通: 221.9.246.35: 0 B/s | N/A 湖北武汉联通: 113.57.249.2: 71.99 KiB/s | 0.56 Mbps 西藏拉萨联通: 221.13.70.244: 10.74 MiB/s | 85.94 Mbps 辽宁沈阳联通: 175.167.135.234: 0 B/s | N/A 山西太原联通: 218.26.109.107: 4.89 MiB/s | 39.16 Mbps 江苏南京联通: 153.37.96.226: 1.28 MiB/s | 10.21 Mbps 安徽合肥移动: 120.209.140.60: 0 B/s | N/A 山西太原移动: 183.203.24.210: 5.38 MiB/s | 43.07 Mbps 四川成都移动: 183.221.247.9: 356.85 KiB/s | 2.79 Mbps 新疆昌吉移动: 117.190.59.82: 0 B/s | N/A 吉林长春移动: 111.26.139.78: 0 B/s | N/A ping: unknown host speedtest1.xz.chinamobile.com 西藏拉萨移动: : 0 B/s | N/A 辽宁沈阳移动: 221.180.176.102: 0 B/s | N/A ping: unknown host speedtest1.hb.chinamobile.com 湖北武汉移动: : 0 B/s | N/A 四川成都教育网: 202.115.1.138: 10.25 MiB/s | 82.02 Mbps |
国内延迟
安徽合肥电信
|
1 2 |
10 packets transmitted, 10 received, 0% packet loss, time 9048ms rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 33.331/34.003/34.880/0.478 ms |
江苏南京电信
|
1 2 |
10 packets transmitted, 10 received, 0% packet loss, time 18168ms rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 34.238/34.619/35.643/0.433 ms |
江西南昌电信
|
1 2 |
10 packets transmitted, 10 received, 0% packet loss, time 19070ms rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 34.330/37.100/39.576/2.431 ms |
新疆昌吉电信
|
1 2 |
10 packets transmitted, 10 received, 0% packet loss, time 9093ms rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 80.717/81.639/87.202/1.913 ms |
安徽合肥联通
|
1 2 |
10 packets transmitted, 10 received, 0% packet loss, time 9039ms rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 35.500/37.504/49.286/3.997 ms |
山东济南联通
|
1 2 |
10 packets transmitted, 10 received, 0% packet loss, time 9045ms rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 26.904/29.032/37.729/3.252 ms |
湖北武汉联通
|
1 2 |
10 packets transmitted, 10 received, 0% packet loss, time 9031ms rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 15.679/15.912/16.796/0.324 ms |
西藏拉萨联通
|
1 2 |
10 packets transmitted, 10 received, 0% packet loss, time 9086ms rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 72.343/72.736/74.332/0.593 ms |
山西太原移动
|
1 2 |
10 packets transmitted, 10 received, 0% packet loss, time 21877ms rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 24.102/24.554/25.390/0.428 ms |
四川成都移动
|
1 2 |
10 packets transmitted, 10 received, 0% packet loss, time 9048ms rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 32.437/44.467/150.894/35.476 ms |
新疆昌吉移动
|
1 2 |
10 packets transmitted, 10 received, 0% packet loss, time 13290ms rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 76.753/87.612/180.691/31.030 ms |
西藏拉萨移动
|
1 2 |
10 packets transmitted, 10 received, 0% packet loss, time 9105ms rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 72.364/80.185/113.603/12.389 ms |
湖北武汉移动
|
1 2 |
10 packets transmitted, 10 received, 0% packet loss, time 28069ms rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 19.144/19.363/19.645/0.184 ms |
四川成都教育网
|
1 2 |
10 packets transmitted, 10 received, 0% packet loss, time 13223ms rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 36.856/37.113/37.639/0.342 ms |
如果你喜欢这篇文章，不妨点击一下下面的『喜欢』按钮
喜欢
(0)
微信扫一扫,分享到朋友圈
最新评论