「测评」UOvZ – 徐州淮海数据中心 VPS 测评报告 徐州电信高防 百兆大带宽

Uovz,一家国人 IDC,隶属于聯訊電信(國際)集團,主要从事云服务器、VPS、独服等产品的销售,数据中心主打中国大陆、中国香港、日本、美国西部沿海,网络质量优异,适合稳定建站等用途。昨天商家新上架了徐州淮海大数据中心,包含徐州电信和徐州联通两个线路,其中电信线路自带100G金盾高防,联通线路自带20G防御。

商家相关信息:

套餐介绍

测评报告

感谢商家提供网站定制测试机,更多测评脚本可查看:

测试数据准确性说明

请注意,所有的测试数据为测试时的实时数据. 我们不保证您的服务商会在日后一直使用保持完全相同的服务,数据仅供参考。

基础信息

项目数据
 CPU 型号Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2696 v2 @ 2.50GHz
 CPU 核心数2
 CPU 主频2499.998 MHz
 硬盘大小144 GB (1.2 GB 已使用)
 内存大小3956 MB (49 MB 已使用)
 SWAP 交换空间大小4093 MB (0 MB 已使用)
 在线时长0 days, 0 hour 8 min
 系统负载0.01, 0.03, 0.00
 系统Debian GNU/Linux 9 x86_64 (64 位)
 内核4.9.0-4-amd64
 地区中国 江苏 徐州 电信
 虚拟化技术kvm

硬盘性能测试

===== 开始硬盘性能测试 =====
ioping: seek rate
    min/avg/max/mdev = 81.7 us / 412.9 us / 73.0 ms / 4.17 ms
ioping: sequential speed
    generated 6 k requests in 5.00 s, 1.46 GiB, 1.20 k iops, 300.0 MiB/s
===== 硬盘性能测试完成 =====

商家对机器的IO有限制,默认限制在300M/S,如果需要解除,请提交工单联系商家

UnixBench

===== 开始UnixBench测试 =====
   BYTE UNIX Benchmarks (Version 5.1.3)

   System: U190416-6XAE: GNU/Linux
   OS: GNU/Linux -- 4.9.0-4-amd64 -- #1 SMP Debian 4.9.51-1 (2017-09-28)
   Machine: x86_64 (unknown)
   Language: en_US.utf8 (charmap="UTF-8", collate="UTF-8")
   CPU 0: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2696 v2 @ 2.50GHz (5000.0 bogomips)
          Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET
   CPU 1: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2696 v2 @ 2.50GHz (5000.0 bogomips)
          Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET
   23:20:45 up 27 min,  1 user,  load average: 0.00, 0.01, 0.00; runlevel 5

------------------------------------------------------------------------
Benchmark Run: Tue Apr 16 2019 23:20:45 - 23:49:03
2 CPUs in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests

Dhrystone 2 using register variables       22115137.9 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone                     2751.8 MWIPS (10.5 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput                               3041.5 lps   (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks        778196.6 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks          205239.5 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks       2155326.5 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput                             1576258.3 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching                 116837.5 lps   (10.1 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation                               6433.0 lps   (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                   8887.6 lpm   (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                   1485.0 lpm   (60.0 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead                        2261445.5 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)

System Benchmarks Index Values               BASELINE       RESULT    INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables         116700.0   22115137.9   1895.0
Double-Precision Whetstone                       55.0       2751.8    500.3
Execl Throughput                                 43.0       3041.5    707.3
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks          3960.0     778196.6   1965.1
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks            1655.0     205239.5   1240.1
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks          5800.0    2155326.5   3716.1
Pipe Throughput                               12440.0    1576258.3   1267.1
Pipe-based Context Switching                   4000.0     116837.5    292.1
Process Creation                                126.0       6433.0    510.6
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                     42.4       8887.6   2096.1
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                      6.0       1485.0   2475.0
System Call Overhead                          15000.0    2261445.5   1507.6
                                                                   ========
System Benchmarks Index Score                                        1200.7

------------------------------------------------------------------------
Benchmark Run: Tue Apr 16 2019 23:49:03 - 00:17:18
2 CPUs in system; running 2 parallel copies of tests

Dhrystone 2 using register variables       45575773.7 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone                     5511.4 MWIPS (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput                               6207.2 lps   (29.8 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks        699805.6 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks          197511.2 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks       2080075.0 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput                             3071322.7 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching                 406774.0 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation                              12985.0 lps   (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                  11753.6 lpm   (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                   1550.8 lpm   (60.0 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead                        3025996.3 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)

System Benchmarks Index Values               BASELINE       RESULT    INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables         116700.0   45575773.7   3905.4
Double-Precision Whetstone                       55.0       5511.4   1002.1
Execl Throughput                                 43.0       6207.2   1443.5
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks          3960.0     699805.6   1767.2
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks            1655.0     197511.2   1193.4
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks          5800.0    2080075.0   3586.3
Pipe Throughput                               12440.0    3071322.7   2468.9
Pipe-based Context Switching                   4000.0     406774.0   1016.9
Process Creation                                126.0      12985.0   1030.6
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                     42.4      11753.6   2772.1
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                      6.0       1550.8   2584.6
System Call Overhead                          15000.0    3025996.3   2017.3
                                                                   ========
System Benchmarks Index Score                                        1849.1

===== UnixBench测试结束 =====

带宽测试

以下带宽测试在安装了锐速加速插件下进行

SpeedTest

CacheFly

root@U190416-6XAE:~# wget http://cachefly.cachefly.net/100mb.test
--2019-04-17 15:30:58--  http://cachefly.cachefly.net/100mb.test
Resolving cachefly.cachefly.net (cachefly.cachefly.net)... 204.93.150.152
Connecting to cachefly.cachefly.net (cachefly.cachefly.net)|204.93.150.152|:80... connected.
HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK
Length: 104857600 (100M) [application/octet-stream]
Saving to: ‘100mb.test’

100mb.test                         100%[================================================================>] 100.00M  5.71MB/s    in 19s     

2019-04-17 15:31:18 (5.34 MB/s) - ‘100mb.test’ saved [104857600/104857600]

官方标称100M带宽,测试下来带宽也符合商家所标识的,从日本拉100M的文件,平均速度能达到5M/S

大陆外网络测试

Node Name:                      IPv4 address:                  Download Speed
CacheFly:                       204.93.150.152:            1.37 MiB/s |   10.94 Mbps
Linode, Tokyo, JP:              106.187.96.148:            7.23 MiB/s |   57.86 Mbps
Linode, Tokyo2, JP:             139.162.65.37:           617.93 KiB/s |    4.83 Mbps
Linode, Singapore, SG:          139.162.23.4:              6.14 MiB/s |   49.12 Mbps
Linode, Fremont, CA:            50.116.14.9:              13.63 MiB/s |  109.07 Mbps
Linode, Newark, NJ:             50.116.57.237:             6.33 MiB/s |   50.67 Mbps
Linode, London, UK:             176.58.107.39:             4.90 MiB/s |   39.24 Mbps
Linode, Frankfurt, DE:          139.162.130.8:            10.37 MiB/s |   82.99 Mbps
Softlayer, Tokyo, JP:           161.202.125.20:           56.90 KiB/s |    0.44 Mbps
Softlayer, Singapore, SG:       119.81.28.170:           228.60 KiB/s |    1.79 Mbps
Softlayer, Seoul, KR:           119.81.28.170:           169.32 KiB/s |    1.32 Mbps
Softlayer, HongKong, CN:        119.81.130.170:           39.22 KiB/s |    0.31 Mbps
Softlayer, Dallas, TX:          169.48.124.82:           304.24 KiB/s |    2.38 Mbps
Softlayer, Seattle, WA:         67.228.112.250:           11.41 KiB/s |    0.09 Mbps
Softlayer, Frankfurt, DE:       159.122.69.4:              6.27 MiB/s |   50.16 Mbps
Softlayer, Paris, FR:           159.8.64.212:              2.25 MiB/s |   17.97 Mbps
Leaseweb, HongKong, CN:         43.249.36.49:                  0 B/s |      N/A     
Leaseweb, Singapore, SG:        103.254.153.18:          106.16 KiB/s |    0.83 Mbps
Leaseweb, Washington D.C., US:  207.244.94.80:             2.18 MiB/s |   17.47 Mbps
Leaseweb, San Francisco, US:    209.58.135.187:           11.30 MiB/s |   90.40 Mbps
Leaseweb, Netherlands, NL:      5.79.108.33:               5.68 MiB/s |   45.47 Mbps
OVH, Montreal, CA:              192.99.19.165:             1.05 MiB/s |    8.37 Mbps
Hinet, Taiwan, TW:              210.61.132.1:              2.45 MiB/s |   19.59 Mbps

大陆内网络测试

节点名称:                   IP地址:                      下载速度  
安徽合肥电信:             61.191.111.11:            41.76 MiB/s |  334.07 Mbps
江苏南京电信:             202.102.23.133:           21.39 MiB/s |  171.10 Mbps
江西南昌电信:             182.98.238.226:            4.48 MiB/s |   35.87 Mbps
新疆昌吉电信:             61.128.107.242:                0 B/s |      N/A     
安徽合肥联通:             112.122.10.26:            27.52 MiB/s |  220.20 Mbps
山东济南联通:             221.214.108.58:           35.38 MiB/s |  283.02 Mbps
吉林长春联通:             221.9.246.35:             28.45 MiB/s |  227.59 Mbps
湖北武汉联通:             113.57.249.2:             31.24 MiB/s |  249.94 Mbps
西藏拉萨联通:             221.13.70.244:                 0 B/s |      N/A     
辽宁沈阳联通:             175.167.135.234:               0 B/s |      N/A     
山西太原联通:             218.26.109.107:           32.78 MiB/s |  262.24 Mbps
江苏南京联通:             153.37.96.226:            15.96 MiB/s |  127.71 Mbps
安徽合肥移动:             120.209.140.60:            6.73 MiB/s |   53.85 Mbps
山西太原移动:             183.203.24.210:           30.39 MiB/s |  243.10 Mbps
四川成都移动:             183.221.247.9:             4.01 KiB/s |    0.03 Mbps
新疆昌吉移动:             117.190.59.82:            16.97 MiB/s |  135.73 Mbps
吉林长春移动:             111.26.139.78:            11.51 MiB/s |   92.06 Mbps
西藏拉萨移动:             211.139.74.234:           23.18 MiB/s |  185.45 Mbps
辽宁沈阳移动:             221.180.176.102:          29.92 MiB/s |  239.33 Mbps
湖北武汉移动:             111.48.26.136:                 0 B/s |      N/A     
四川成都教育网:          :                              0 B/s |      N/A

丢包测试

国内的机器就不再测试丢包,反正也没丢包……

回程路由

这里测试的是国外到本地的路由

台湾

香港

新加坡

日本东京

韩国

美国洛杉矶

短评

国内大带宽加100G金盾硬防加中国电信优质网络,非常适合用来建站,也可用作中转机,老板后期会上BGP三线。

参与评论