Uovz，一家国人 IDC，隶属于聯訊電信（國際）集團，主要从事云服务器、VPS、独服等产品的销售，数据中心主打中国大陆、中国香港、日本、美国西部沿海，网络质量优异，适合稳定建站等用途。昨天商家新上架了徐州淮海大数据中心，包含徐州电信和徐州联通两个线路，其中电信线路自带100G金盾高防，联通线路自带20G防御。
商家相关信息：
- TG群组：https://t.me/UoVzCloud
- TG频道：https://t.me/UOvZNewS
套餐介绍
[post id="2736"][/post]
测评报告
感谢商家提供网站定制测试机，更多测评脚本可查看：
[post id="1383"][/post]
测试数据准确性说明
请注意，所有的测试数据为测试时的实时数据. 我们不保证您的服务商会在日后一直使用保持完全相同的服务，数据仅供参考。
基础信息
| 项目 | 数据 |
|---|---|
| CPU 型号 | Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2696 v2 @ 2.50GHz |
| CPU 核心数 | 2 |
| CPU 主频 | 2499.998 MHz |
| 硬盘大小 | 144 GB (1.2 GB 已使用) |
| 内存大小 | 3956 MB (49 MB 已使用) |
| SWAP 交换空间大小 | 4093 MB (0 MB 已使用) |
| 在线时长 | 0 days, 0 hour 8 min |
| 系统负载 | 0.01, 0.03, 0.00 |
| 系统 | Debian GNU/Linux 9 x86_64 (64 位) |
| 内核 | 4.9.0-4-amd64 |
| 地区 | 中国 江苏 徐州 电信 |
| 虚拟化技术 | kvm |
硬盘性能测试
===== 开始硬盘性能测试 =====
ioping: seek rate
min/avg/max/mdev = 81.7 us / 412.9 us / 73.0 ms / 4.17 ms
ioping: sequential speed
generated 6 k requests in 5.00 s, 1.46 GiB, 1.20 k iops, 300.0 MiB/s
===== 硬盘性能测试完成 =====
商家对机器的IO有限制，默认限制在300M/S，如果需要解除，请提交工单联系商家
UnixBench
===== 开始UnixBench测试 =====
BYTE UNIX Benchmarks (Version 5.1.3)
System: U190416-6XAE: GNU/Linux
OS: GNU/Linux -- 4.9.0-4-amd64 -- #1 SMP Debian 4.9.51-1 (2017-09-28)
Machine: x86_64 (unknown)
Language: en_US.utf8 (charmap="UTF-8", collate="UTF-8")
CPU 0: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2696 v2 @ 2.50GHz (5000.0 bogomips)
Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET
CPU 1: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2696 v2 @ 2.50GHz (5000.0 bogomips)
Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET
23:20:45 up 27 min, 1 user, load average: 0.00, 0.01, 0.00; runlevel 5
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Benchmark Run: Tue Apr 16 2019 23:20:45 - 23:49:03
2 CPUs in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 22115137.9 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone 2751.8 MWIPS (10.5 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput 3041.5 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 778196.6 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 205239.5 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 2155326.5 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput 1576258.3 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching 116837.5 lps (10.1 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation 6433.0 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 8887.6 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 1485.0 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead 2261445.5 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 22115137.9 1895.0
Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 2751.8 500.3
Execl Throughput 43.0 3041.5 707.3
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 778196.6 1965.1
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 205239.5 1240.1
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 2155326.5 3716.1
Pipe Throughput 12440.0 1576258.3 1267.1
Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 116837.5 292.1
Process Creation 126.0 6433.0 510.6
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 8887.6 2096.1
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 1485.0 2475.0
System Call Overhead 15000.0 2261445.5 1507.6
========
System Benchmarks Index Score 1200.7
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Benchmark Run: Tue Apr 16 2019 23:49:03 - 00:17:18
2 CPUs in system; running 2 parallel copies of tests
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 45575773.7 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone 5511.4 MWIPS (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput 6207.2 lps (29.8 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 699805.6 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 197511.2 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 2080075.0 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput 3071322.7 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching 406774.0 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation 12985.0 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 11753.6 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 1550.8 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead 3025996.3 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 45575773.7 3905.4
Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 5511.4 1002.1
Execl Throughput 43.0 6207.2 1443.5
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 699805.6 1767.2
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 197511.2 1193.4
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 2080075.0 3586.3
Pipe Throughput 12440.0 3071322.7 2468.9
Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 406774.0 1016.9
Process Creation 126.0 12985.0 1030.6
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 11753.6 2772.1
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 1550.8 2584.6
System Call Overhead 15000.0 3025996.3 2017.3
========
System Benchmarks Index Score 1849.1
===== UnixBench测试结束 =====
带宽测试
以下带宽测试在安装了锐速加速插件下进行
SpeedTest
CacheFly
root@U190416-6XAE:~# wget http://cachefly.cachefly.net/100mb.test --2019-04-17 15:30:58-- http://cachefly.cachefly.net/100mb.test Resolving cachefly.cachefly.net (cachefly.cachefly.net)... 204.93.150.152 Connecting to cachefly.cachefly.net (cachefly.cachefly.net)|204.93.150.152|:80... connected. HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK Length: 104857600 (100M) [application/octet-stream] Saving to: ‘100mb.test’ 100mb.test 100%[================================================================>] 100.00M 5.71MB/s in 19s 2019-04-17 15:31:18 (5.34 MB/s) - ‘100mb.test’ saved [104857600/104857600]
官方标称100M带宽，测试下来带宽也符合商家所标识的，从日本拉100M的文件，平均速度能达到5M/S
大陆外网络测试
Node Name: IPv4 address: Download Speed CacheFly: 204.93.150.152: 1.37 MiB/s | 10.94 Mbps Linode, Tokyo, JP: 106.187.96.148: 7.23 MiB/s | 57.86 Mbps Linode, Tokyo2, JP: 139.162.65.37: 617.93 KiB/s | 4.83 Mbps Linode, Singapore, SG: 139.162.23.4: 6.14 MiB/s | 49.12 Mbps Linode, Fremont, CA: 50.116.14.9: 13.63 MiB/s | 109.07 Mbps Linode, Newark, NJ: 50.116.57.237: 6.33 MiB/s | 50.67 Mbps Linode, London, UK: 176.58.107.39: 4.90 MiB/s | 39.24 Mbps Linode, Frankfurt, DE: 139.162.130.8: 10.37 MiB/s | 82.99 Mbps Softlayer, Tokyo, JP: 161.202.125.20: 56.90 KiB/s | 0.44 Mbps Softlayer, Singapore, SG: 119.81.28.170: 228.60 KiB/s | 1.79 Mbps Softlayer, Seoul, KR: 119.81.28.170: 169.32 KiB/s | 1.32 Mbps Softlayer, HongKong, CN: 119.81.130.170: 39.22 KiB/s | 0.31 Mbps Softlayer, Dallas, TX: 169.48.124.82: 304.24 KiB/s | 2.38 Mbps Softlayer, Seattle, WA: 67.228.112.250: 11.41 KiB/s | 0.09 Mbps Softlayer, Frankfurt, DE: 159.122.69.4: 6.27 MiB/s | 50.16 Mbps Softlayer, Paris, FR: 159.8.64.212: 2.25 MiB/s | 17.97 Mbps Leaseweb, HongKong, CN: 43.249.36.49: 0 B/s | N/A Leaseweb, Singapore, SG: 103.254.153.18: 106.16 KiB/s | 0.83 Mbps Leaseweb, Washington D.C., US: 207.244.94.80: 2.18 MiB/s | 17.47 Mbps Leaseweb, San Francisco, US: 209.58.135.187: 11.30 MiB/s | 90.40 Mbps Leaseweb, Netherlands, NL: 5.79.108.33: 5.68 MiB/s | 45.47 Mbps OVH, Montreal, CA: 192.99.19.165: 1.05 MiB/s | 8.37 Mbps Hinet, Taiwan, TW: 210.61.132.1: 2.45 MiB/s | 19.59 Mbps
大陆内网络测试
节点名称: IP地址: 下载速度 安徽合肥电信: 61.191.111.11: 41.76 MiB/s | 334.07 Mbps 江苏南京电信: 202.102.23.133: 21.39 MiB/s | 171.10 Mbps 江西南昌电信: 182.98.238.226: 4.48 MiB/s | 35.87 Mbps 新疆昌吉电信: 61.128.107.242: 0 B/s | N/A 安徽合肥联通: 112.122.10.26: 27.52 MiB/s | 220.20 Mbps 山东济南联通: 221.214.108.58: 35.38 MiB/s | 283.02 Mbps 吉林长春联通: 221.9.246.35: 28.45 MiB/s | 227.59 Mbps 湖北武汉联通: 113.57.249.2: 31.24 MiB/s | 249.94 Mbps 西藏拉萨联通: 221.13.70.244: 0 B/s | N/A 辽宁沈阳联通: 175.167.135.234: 0 B/s | N/A 山西太原联通: 218.26.109.107: 32.78 MiB/s | 262.24 Mbps 江苏南京联通: 153.37.96.226: 15.96 MiB/s | 127.71 Mbps 安徽合肥移动: 120.209.140.60: 6.73 MiB/s | 53.85 Mbps 山西太原移动: 183.203.24.210: 30.39 MiB/s | 243.10 Mbps 四川成都移动: 183.221.247.9: 4.01 KiB/s | 0.03 Mbps 新疆昌吉移动: 117.190.59.82: 16.97 MiB/s | 135.73 Mbps 吉林长春移动: 111.26.139.78: 11.51 MiB/s | 92.06 Mbps 西藏拉萨移动: 211.139.74.234: 23.18 MiB/s | 185.45 Mbps 辽宁沈阳移动: 221.180.176.102: 29.92 MiB/s | 239.33 Mbps 湖北武汉移动: 111.48.26.136: 0 B/s | N/A 四川成都教育网: : 0 B/s | N/A
丢包测试
国内的机器就不再测试丢包，反正也没丢包……
回程路由
这里测试的是国外到本地的路由
[toggle hide="no" title="台湾" color=""]
[/toggle][toggle hide="yes" title="香港" color=""]
[/toggle][toggle hide="yes" title="新加坡" color=""]
[/toggle][toggle hide="yes" title="日本东京" color=""]
[/toggle][toggle hide="yes" title="韩国" color=""]
[/toggle][toggle hide="yes" title="美国洛杉矶" color=""]
[/toggle]
短评
国内大带宽加100G金盾硬防加中国电信优质网络，非常适合用来建站，也可用作中转机，老板后期会上BGP三线。
声明：本文为原创，作者为 Mr_KevinH，转载时请保留本声明及附带文章链接：https://www.mrkevin.net/zbench/2753.html
发表评论